The deliberately-executed distraction and turmoil of President Trump’s policies in the U.S. threaten and weary us all, at the same time that well-planned resistance is most necessary. Long-time activist Frances Fox-Piven wrote in The Nation in January, before the Inauguration, “Throw sand in the gears of everything”, reflecting on past resistance movements in U.S. history, including civil rights and the Vietnam War. She asks, “ So how do resistance movements win—if they win—in the face of an unrelentingly hostile regime? The answer, I think, is that by blocking or sabotaging the policy initiatives of the regime, resistance movements can create or deepen elite and electoral cleavages”. Fox Piven puts strong hope in the actions of state and local governments, as well as citizen action. She also points to the defining protest which finally turned government policy on the Vietnam War: soldiers refused to followed orders.
In “Where’s the best place to resist Trump? At Work” ( Washington Post ,Jan. 31; re-posted to Portside) the authors argue that “ From solidarity strikes to slowdowns and sit-ins, workplace revolt is a key strategy in opposing the new administration”. Describing some of the early anti-Trump protests, they state: “These actions are indispensable, and may form the seeds of a new movement, but people should not ignore one of the most powerful means of resistance and protest that they have: their roles as workers.” Federal workers are not the only ones with the power to resist and disrupt, though federal workers are leading the way with courageous initiatives such as information leaks and alternative Twitter accounts. The longshoremen in Oakland, California for example, declined to report for work on Inauguration Day : see “Want to Stop Trump? Take a Page From These Dockworkers, and Stop Work” in In These Times (Jan. 23). Or read “Some New York Taxi Drivers Are Striking In Protest Of Trump’s Refugee Ban” in Buzzfeed (Jan. 29).
Resistance by federal workers is described in “In Show of Internal Dissent, Federal Workers Rising Up Against Trump” a February 1 article from Common Dreams. Another ongoing, public form are the many “rogue” Twitter accounts, started by the National Parks Service ,and now including very active accounts at alt_EPA (with over 300,000 followers), alt_Interior , alt_NOAA , alt_DOL , and more. Ironically, they form a goldmine of activist information. But beware of trolling accounts and imposter accounts.
Other web sources to follow U.S. developments, especially those related to climate change and environmental regulations, are: Climate Central ; Common Dreams ; Democracy Now: Donald Trump Coverage ; Inside Climate News; Think Progress ; and 350.org . Also notable, Deregulation Tracker , where the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law (Columbia Law School) is monitoring changes to legislation and regulations, and the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative , which is monitoring, documenting, and analyzing changes to approximately 25,000 federal websites using proprietary software that allows them to track changes to the language and code. Climate Central published “The EPA Has Started to Remove Obama-era Information” (Feb. 2) based on the EDGI monitoring.