According to a June 12 press release, the Legislature of British Columbia will be recalled on June 22, when a confidence motion will determine who will lead the government after the cliff-hanger election of May 9. Read “Greens to prop up NDP’s Horgan in minority BC government” in the National Observer (May 29) for an overview of the alliance reached between the Green Party and the New Democratic Party (NDP) as they prepare to form the new provincial government. What have they agreed on? The text of the “Supply and Confidence” agreement, “founded on the principles of good faith and no surprises”, is available at the B.C. NDP website . Major points of agreement on climate change issues are: implacable opposition to the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline; an increase in the province’s carbon tax by $5 a tonne each year from April 2018, rising to the nationally required $50 a tonne by 2021; a six-month, independent review of the unpopular Site C hydroelectric project (a concession by the Greens, who had wanted to axe it outright); revival of the province’s Climate Leadership Team; and an investigation into the safety of fracking. Read also “What does a NDP- Green Alliance mean for Climate Change?” in the Climate Examiner (June 8), and for the larger picture beyond climate change-related issues, see “ BC NDP-Green agreement offers historic opportunity for game-changing new policies” by Seth Klein and Shannon Daub of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives B.C. , or “NDP and Greens Promise Electoral Reform Referendum, Big Money Ban and Higher Carbon Tax” in The Tyee (May 30).
The national implications of the coming changes to B.C. energy policy are raised by Kathryn Harris in “A Historic moment for B.C. Politics and our Environment” in the Globe and Mail (updated June 1), who states: “At the heart of the Trudeau government’s 2016 climate plan lies a political compromise: a commitment to pursue reductions in Canada’s own greenhouse gas emissions in exchange for expansion of fossil-fuel exports to other countries via new pipelines. The looming NDP-Green partnership in British Columbia reveals both the political fragility of that compromise and the contradiction of climate leadership funded by fossil-fuel development.”
In that controversial pipeline debate: new, required reading from the Parkland Institute: Will the Trans Mountain Pipeline and Tidewater Access Boost Prices and Save Canada’s Oil Industry?. Author David Hughes challenges the contention by pipeline proponents (for example, Alberta Premier Rachel Notley) that Alberta would benefit from a “tidewater premium” by reaching global markets, and concludes that “The new BC government would be wise to withdraw the Province’s approval for this project.” And “Showdown looms for LNG project”, an overview article in The Globe and Mail indicates the changes likely to come on that file, although the NDP-Green agreement doesn’t explicitly address the LNG issue.
The Pembina Institute offers an alternative to the Clark fossil fuel economy, in their Vision for Clean Growth Economy for B.C., released in May. It outlines five key priorities and makes specific recommendations for their achievement: 1. Build a strong clean tech sector 2. Position B.C. to be competitive in the changing global economy 3. Make clean choices more affordable 4. Stand up for healthy and safe communities, and 5. Grow sustainable resource jobs.