While British Columbia is understandably preoccupied with the devastating wildfires raging across the entire province, an engagement process called Towards a Clean Growth Future in B.C. was launched on July 20, with a short, summertime deadline of August 24.
Three brief Intentions Papers have been published to solicit public input : Clean Transportation ,which discusses policies to incentivize Zero Emissions Vehicles – including the possibility of a ban the sale of new gasoline and diesel light duty vehicles by 2040; Clean, Efficient Buildings, which proposes five steps to cleaner buildings, including Energy efficiency labeling information, financial incentives, and additional training for workers in energy efficient retrofitting and in the new-build Energy Step code; and A Clean Growth Program for Industry , which includes the province’s Industrial Incentive under the carbon tax regime and addresses the potential dangers of “carbon leakage”.
Public Submissions are available online and to date have been submitted by: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA), written by Marc Lee ; Closer Commutes ; The Wilderness Committee ; and The Pembina Institute , which at 37 pages is extremely detailed, and includes 5 recommendations relating to Training and Certification for Clean Buildings, including a call for “a construction labour strategy that addresses skilled labour gaps and equity issues in the building industry. Integrate with emerging technology and innovation strategy to foster greater use of automation and prefabrication.”
The West Coast Environmental Law Association (WCEL) also posted a thorough discussion of the Clean Growth proposals on its own website on August 16. “BC’s decade-delayed climate strategies show why we need legal accountability” by Andrew Gage notes that the intentions papers are largely built on existing proposals (some dating back to the 2008 Climate Action Team Report ), and that they are not complete, as the government is also developing proposals through its Climate Solutions and Clean Growth Advisory Council and the newly appointed Emerging Economy Task Force . (The Wilderness Committee calls the proposals “underwhelming”). Whatever the final policies that flow from these consultations, WCEL emphasizes the importance of demanding accountability, and like Marc Lee in his submission, points to the success of the U.K.’s Climate Accountability Act (2008). WCEL has previously critiqued Bill 34, B.C.’s Climate Change Accountability Act which received Royal Assent on May 31 2018.
Another commentary, appearing in the National Observer (July 27) addresses the weakness of the transportation proposals. “B.C.’s climate plan needs a push – from you” refers to the author’s more detailed report, Transportation Transformation: Building complete communities and a zero-emission transportation system in BC , which was published by the CCPA in 2011.
The CCPA also published an article on August 2, 2018 in Policy Note: “The Problem with B.C.’s Clean Growth climate rhetoric” . Author Marc Lee reviews the history of the term “clean growth” and offers his critique, noting that clean growth “promises change without fundamentally disrupting the existing economic and social order.”
Individuals have until August 24 to can email their input to firstname.lastname@example.org .