On September 21, Canada’s Minister of Natural Resources announced that the federal government has begun its path forward after the Court of Appeal decision on August 30 which stopped the Trans Mountain Pipeline. The press release states: “we have instructed the National Energy Board (NEB) to reconsider its recommendations, taking into account the effects of project-related marine shipping. The NEB will be required to complete a thorough and prompt review and deliver its report within 22 weeks.”… and “…the NEB will provide participant funding so that the views of Indigenous groups are well represented in the Board’s consideration of marine issues.” The National Energy Board website provides official news of the new Order in Council here.
A CBC report on September 21 summarizes the government action and reactions: “Ottawa gives pipeline regulator 22 weeks to review Trans Mountain expansion project” ; in it, the Minister promises a further announcement on improved consultations with First Nations (one of the two grounds cited by the Court of Appeal for quashing the project).
Although her office hasn’t released an official statement, Alberta’s Premier Rachel Notley has taken a hard line in media interviews, as reported by CBC on Sept 21) : “We will not tolerate legal game playing,”… “And should it start to appear that game playing is working, we will hold Ottawa’s feet to the fire.”
From federal Conservative party leader Andrew Scheer: “Ottawa needs ‘special representative’ to consult Indigenous groups and save Trans Mountain, says Scheer” (Sept. 24); From B.C.’s Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, a press release limited to cautious acknowledgement; and from Perry Bellegarde, National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, as quoted in The Straight (Sept. 25) : it would be “a win-win-win” to move the terminal from Burnaby to Delta, thus avoiding concerns about tanker traffic in the sensitive Burrard Inlet (but not addressing any concerns to “keep it in the ground”).
West Coast Environmental Law has written a thorough summary of the August Court of Appeal decision , and suggested questions for the coming review. Ottawa is also facing a call from Washington State for improved oil spill protocols for the part of the Trans Mountain pipeline which passes through the Puget Sound, according to the National Observer (Sept 25).
“Colossal” new oil sands mine: But as all eyes are on the progress of this Trans Mountain review, another enormous oil sands project is under consideration. “Hearings begin today into a $20-billion oilsands mine that’s even bigger than the massive Fort Hills” in The Financial Post (Sept. 24), reporting the on a five-week, joint-review panel regulatory hearing by Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and Alberta Energy Regulator into the development of the Frontier oilsands mine by Teck Resources. The Narwhal analysis describes the Frontier mine as “ a colossal undertaking that relies on ‘relentless’ growth in world oil demand at a time of global climate precarity”. Read “One of the largest oilsands mines ever proposed advances to public hearings” from The Narwhal for background and discussion of the potential impact, including the economic arguments, for this new development.