On October 23, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that the federal government will hold its resolve to impose a carbon pricing policy across all Canadian jurisdictions in 2019 – see the press release, “Government of Canada Putting a price on pollution” (Oct. 23). Key to the plan: the Climate Action Incentive, whereby all carbon revenue will go directly back to people in the provinces from which it was generated. David Roberts of Vox hits the nail on the head with “Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is betting his reelection on a carbon tax” (Oct. 24) , stating, “It’s a thoughtful plan, remarkably simple, transparent, and economically sound for something cooked up in a politically fraught context. If it’s put into place (and stays in place), it would vault Canada to the head of the international pack on climate policy.”
Reaction from the Canadian mainstream media: From the Globe and Mail, an Editorial: “For the Liberals, a spoonful of sugar helps the carbon tax go down” ; “Arguments against the carbon tax boil down to a desire to do nothing” (Oct. 24) by Campbell Clark ; “Carbon tax vs. climate change will be an epic contest” by John Ibbitson and “Trudeau’s carbon tax rebate is smart – but complicated” by Chris Ragan of the Ecofiscal Commission . From Andrew Coyne in the National Post: “Liberals’ carbon tax plan has its faults — but who has a better option?” and from Chris Hall of the CBC, “How the Liberals hope to escape the ‘Green Shift’ curse in 2019” (Oct.23) .
The National Observer provides some detail to the complex calculations of the backstop rebates of the Climate Action Incentive, but the detail is at the government’s webpage, Pricing Pollution: How it will work which provides links to individual explainers for each province and territory.
Other Responses: Rabble.ca ; Elizabeth May of the Green Party of Canada ; Canadians for Clean Prosperity ; and the Smart Prosperity Institute , which also provides a compilation of reaction and reports .
There seems to be general agreement that it is politics, not economics, which will determine support for the carbon plan. Ontario Premier Doug Ford has been making the rounds with other Conservative politicians in Canada to coordinate their messaging and opposition to the federal carbon tax – culminating in the introduction of Bill No. 132—The Management and Reduction of Greenhouse Gases Amendment Act , 2018 in Saskatchewan on October 30, and on October 31, passage of Ontario’s Bill 4, The Cap and Trade Cancellation Act. The National Observer describes the events of October 31 and summarizes the recent political dance in “Doug Ford and Andrew Scheer play fast and loose with facts about carbon tax” . Other press coverage: from the CBC: “‘The worst tax ever’: Doug Ford and Jason Kenney hold campaign-style rally against carbon levy” on Oct. 5 ; “Doug Ford attacks ‘terrible tax’ on carbon alongside Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe” on Oct. 29; and “Doug Ford meets Andrew Scheer as carbon tax war heats up” on October 30, describing their meeting in Toronto. The gist of their arguments: the carbon tax is a money-grab which will “drive up the price of heating your home”, with Doug Ford stating “It’s just another Trudeau Liberal tax grab. It’s a job-killing, family-hurting tax. ” After the rebate details were announced on October 23, Ford has added that the promised rebates are “a complete scam”, “trying to buy Canadians with their own money.” But as iPolitics reported on October 26, “Ford gets his facts wrong while bashing federal carbon tax” and “Ford doubles down on falsehoods about federal carbon tax” . iPolitics cites the independent analysis of the carbon tax’s impact by Ontario’s Financial Accountability Officer, which supports the federal government’s numbers, and differs from Premier Ford’s public statements. Meanwhile, the Ontario government promises to release their climate plan in November, according to the Toronto Star (Oct. 29), and Andrew Scheer also promises a climate plan “in 183 days”.