Despite the ongoing contentious development of Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) in British Columbia and commitments to end fossil fuel subsidies, on June 24 federal Finance Minister Morneau announced that the federal government will invest $275 million into LNG Canada’s $40 billion liquefied natural gas project in Kitimat: $220 million to be spent on energy-efficient gas turbines for the project, and $55 million spent on replacing the Haisla Bridge in Kitimat. The announcement is summarized by the CBC in “Feds announce $275M ‘largest private sector investment in Canadian history’ — Kitimat, B.C.’s LNG project”
The Narwhal maintains an ongoing archive of excellent articles which chronicle the controversy over fracking and LNG in B.C, here . Two recent “must read” articles from: “6 Awkward Realities behind B.C.’s big LNG Giveaway” (April 6) which discusses the B.C. government’s move to bundle tax exemptions and cheap electricity rates into a $5.35 billion incentive package for LNG Canada in March 2019, and “B.C. government quietly posts response to expert fracking report” (June 28) which discusses the government’s response to the report of its own independent Scientific Review of Hydraulic Fracturing in British Columbia, released in February 2019. As noted in the Narwhal article, the panel was mandated to assess the potential impacts of fracking on water quantity and quality; on seismic activity, and on fugitive emissions – but not on public health, despite concerns raised and the known scientific evidence. According to the government news release, a working group has been established to address the 97 recommendations made by the expert panel.
Some recent relevant reading about LNG and the fracking associated with its production:
RE the Emissions of LNG: The New Gas Boom , published on July 1 by the Global Energy Monitor, an international non-governmental organization that catalogues fossil-fuel infrastructure. The report states that a growing global supply of natural gas is on a “collision course” with the Paris Agreement, and that the increase in natural gas is driven largely by the North American fracking boom- with 39% of new development occurring in the U.S., 35% in Canada. The GEM report is discussed from a Canadian viewpoint in “Global boom in natural gas is undermining climate change action: report” National Observer (July 2) and “’Clean’ natural gas is actually the new coal, report says: Don Pittis” at CBC . Previous to the Global Energy Monitor report, Marc Lee had weighed in on the high GHG emissions of fracked natural gas in “ LNG’s Big Lie”, an article in the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Policy Note ( Lee’s arguments were also published in The Georgia Straight, (June 17) and an OpEd in The Globe and Mail . )
In the U.S. in June 19, The sixth edition of the Compendium of Scientific, Medical, and Media Findings Demonstrating Risks and Harms of Fracking was published by Physicians for Social Responsibility and Concerned Health Professionals of New York. Written by scientists, doctors and journalists, it is an analysis of original research studies published from 2016-2018 on the health impacts of fracking . One of the most impactful statements from the press release: “The notion that natural gas can serve as an intermediate “bridge fuel” between coal and renewable energy is fallacious and now disproven by new scientific evidence showing that methane is a more powerful greenhouse gas than formerly appreciated and escapes in larger amounts from all parts of the extraction and distribution process than previously presumed, including from inactive, long-abandoned wells. Grossly underestimating methane emissions threatens to undermine the efficacy of efforts to combat climate change.” A summary press release is here , or see the Common Dreams article “’We Need to Ban Fracking’: New Analysis of 1,500 Scientific Studies Details Threat to Health and Climate” (June 19).
International Energy Agency report, LNG Market Trends and their Implications (June 20) provides statistical analysis of the changing Asian markets for LNG.