The federal election in Canada takes place on September 20, and according to an Abacus poll conducted on September 4, climate change remains one of the top concerns of voters. The Liberal Party Platform document was officially released on September 1, preceded by a climate plan announced on Aug. 29 (summarized by a 2-page Fact Sheet ). The Conservative platform was accompanied by a separate climate plan, Secure the Environment . The New Democratic Party platform also is accompanied with specific climate action commitments here. And just before the Leaders’ debates on Sept. 8 and 9, the Green Party released their full platform on Labour Day weekend.
The overall Platform statements are compared by the CBC and by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives: the “Platform Crunch” for the Liberals (Sept. 3) ; Conservatives (Aug. 18); and for the NDP (Aug. 13).
How do the parties’ Platforms compare on climate change?
It is easy to summarize the differing GHG emissions reductions targets of the parties, with the Green Party committed to a target of 60 per cent by 2030 from 2005 levels and net negative emissions in 2050. The Liberal Party commits to reducing emissions by 40-45 per cent by 2030 compared to 2005 levels, which is the target they have committed to as a government in the Net-Zero Accountability Act. The NDP target is to cut its emissions by 50 per cent by 2030 compared to 2005 levels, and commit to establishing multi-year national and sectoral carbon budgets. The Conservative Party promising to retreat to the Harper-era target of 30% reduction by 2030 – which would violate Canada’s obligation under the Paris Agreement.
Environmental Defence has produced a 2-page voter’s guide identifying the other key issues, along with sample questions voters may want to ask their candidates. Here is a selection of comparisons and summaries on a variety of issues:
“Election 2021: How the four main federal parties plan to fight climate crisis” (National Observer, Aug. 18)
“Election 2021 A Comparison of Climate Policy in Federal Party Platforms (Smart Prosperity, Aug. 30)
“Where they stand. The parties on Climate Change” (The Tyee, Aug. 31)
“How do the federal parties stack up on climate change?” (Clean Energy Canada, Sept. 7)
“What the parties are promising so far” (Ecojustice, Sept. 7), which uniquely includes the Bloc Quebecois in its comparison. Ecojustice emphasizes promises related to environmental justice – the strongest of which are from the Green Party (to establish an Office of Environmental Justice at Environment and Climate Change Canada, and to support Bill C-230, the National Strategy Respecting Environmental Racism and Environmental Justice Act); and the NDP, ( to enshrine the right to a healthy environment in a Canadian Environmental Bill of Rights and to create an Office of Environmental Justice) .
What’s in the Liberals’ $78B platform? Plenty of Green (National Observer, September 2)
“Liberals move to outflank NDP on green issues” (Dogwood Institute, Aug. 31) which observes that the federal NDP is hampered by the provincial NDP government of British Columbia , which supports LNG development and has overseen the huge civil disobedience protests at the Fairy Creek Old Growth forest.
“Federal leaders promise action to protect B.C. old growth” (Stand.earth press release , Aug. 25)
“Liberals pledge $2 Billion to aid just transition” (National Observer, Aug. 31), quoting the new head of Iron and Earth judgement that it’s a good start, but inadequate.
“Assessing climate sincerity in the Canadian 2021 election” by Mark Jaccard, (Policy Options, Sept.3) wherein the prominent energy economist argues that “the key policy indicators of sincerity are the carbon price level and regulatory stringency”, and assesses Liberal policies as “effective and affordable”, and the NDP as “Largely ineffective, unnecessarily costly”.
“Liberals are promising net-zero buildings by 2050. Can they make it happen?” (National Observer, Sept. 7)
“Conservative climate plan better than before, but still full of inconsistencies” (CBC, Aug. 30). Opinion piece by Jennifer Winter, associate professor and Scientific Director of Energy and Environmental Policy at the School of Public Policy at the University of Calgary, focussing on the Conservatives’ proposals for industrial emissions carbon pricing and calling it “a spectacularly bad idea” and “ the worst of both worlds. “
“O’Toole defends climate plan while promising to revive oil pipeline projects” (CBC, Aug. 30), reporting that the Conservative leader has promised to revive the Northern Gateway pipeline and push forward with Trans Mountain pipeline.
“O’Toole Pledges to Break the Paris Agreement” (Energy Mix, Aug. 29). Conservatives are “pledged to move boldly backwards on Canada’s emissions reduction target”, reviving the Harper-era GHG reduction target of 30% by 2030.
“Erin O’Toole vows to increase criminal punishment for people who disrupt pipelines and railways” (The Narwhal, Aug. 19) O’Toole promises to enact the Critical Infrastructure Protection Act.
“Jagmeet Singh promises to kill fossil fuel subsidies” (National Observer, Aug. 23) A core demand of environmentalists, which Trudeau is still vague on.
“A vote against fossil fuel subsidies is a vote for our health ” (National Observer, Sept. 3)
Analysis of electric vehicles platform promises in Electric Autonomy, Aug. 30.