On November 29, the government of Canada announced the highly anticipated decision to approve the expansion of two pipeline projects: Line 3 (with 37 conditions) and the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Expansion pipeline project (with 157 conditions). The Northern Gateway project was finally, officially dismissed.
Reaction, focused on Kinder Morgan, was swift and strong and very critical on many grounds: economic, environmental, and as a betrayal of the rights of First Nations. The Globe and Mail summarized reaction and quoted a Stand.earth representative that the decision “signals the beginning of a new phase in the struggle against pipelines” – which will include protests, the courts, and the ballot box. And immediately, on December 1, a rally to support the Dakota Access Pipeline protests expanded to include Kinder Morgan protest, with over 1000 people on the streets of Victoria, B.C., according to the National Observer. See also “Trudeau’s pipeline approvals spark protests” , which quotes the president of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers: “”You can either be serious about climate change, or you can expand the tarsands. But you cannot do both.” Others have written with the same message: UBC Professor Kathryn Harrison in the Globe and Mail ; Simon Donner in “Blowing the Budget on Pipelines” (Nov. 30) in Policy Options; Seth Klein and Shannon Daub of the Canadian Centre for Policy Analysis (CCPA) in a Policy Note article, “The New Climate Denialism“; Tzeporah Berman, “Pipelines of Paris: Can Canada have its cake and eat it too? “. David Hughes’June 2016 report, Can Canada Expand Oil and Gas Production, Build Pipelines and Keep Its Climate Change Commitments? is again being widely cited.
The same message comes from a a Dec. 13 article, “ With Oil Sands Ambitions on a Collision Course With Climate Change, Exxon Still Stepping on the Gas” by Inside Climate News (the Pulitizer Prize winning news organization whose reporting has sparked the current U.S. investigations into Exxon). This highly detailed historical look at Imperial Oil investments and operations in Canada (complete with photos of Murray Westgate), concludes by noting the recent pipelines approvals, and states: “Canadian officials, who have committed the nation to emissions cuts, continue to promote growth, even though environmentalists say the two are incompatible….Politicans are not being honest with Canadians.”
Opposition in the courts – with seven cases already underway – is being led by First Nations. In an OpEd in the Globe and Mail, Grand Chief Stewart Phillip of the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs wrote: “ Prime Minister Justin Trudeau failed to protect the health and safety of Canadians or uphold his government’s vaunted new relationship with First Peoples when he announced approval for the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.” He stated that there are more than 10,000 “Coastal Protectors” who are ready “to do what needs to be done to stop Kinder Morgan”. This is in addition to the Treaty Alliance Against Tar Sands Expansion formed by 50 First Nations and tribes from all over Canada and the Northern U.S. in in September 2016 – now over 100 – to work together to stop all proposed tar sands pipeline , tanker and rail projects in their respective territorial lands and waters. And see DeSmog blog, “ Federal Liberals Approval of Kinder Morgan Is Final Nail in the Coffin of ‘Reconciliation’ . For a first-person account of First Nations reactions and mobilization, see “Field notes: A week of pipeline action and cross-Canada solidarity” from West Coast Environmental Law.
From Greenpeace : “With this announcement, Prime Minister Trudeau has broken his climate commitments, broken his commitments to Indigenous rights, and has declared war on B.C. If Prime Minister Trudeau wanted to bring Standing Rock-like protests to Canada, he succeeded.” Similarly, Common Dreams published “Kinder Morgan Pipeline Might Be Canada’s DAPL ” (Dec. 4) , and from ThinkProgress , ” The next Standing Rock: Fossil fuel battles loom across North America“.
Representing reaction from ground zero, British Columbia: The B.C. office of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives blogged: “Trudeau disappoints a generation, betrays rights and title of Indigenous people with Kinder Morgan decision” . Andrew Nikoforuk wrote in The Tyee , “Kinder Morgan Approval Insults Democracy, Science and Economic Logic” (Nov. 30) , that the decision “put his government on a collision course with First Nations and British Columbia’s coastal communities.” Robyn Allan, quoted by Nikoforuk, states: “Trudeau has out-trumped Stephen Harper.”